On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> [just casting the net a bit wider ...]
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:51:47 +0100 Stefano Stabellini
> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I forgot to CC the LKML and linux-next...
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Stephen,
> > > I have two patch series to merge in linux-next:
> > >
> > > PV on HVM: receive interrupts as xen events
> > > xen: initial domain support
> > >
> > > they have all the acked-by needed and are both stable since several
> > > weeks, however they depend on Konrad's xen-pcifront series and for this
> > > reason I waited until now to ask for a merge in linux-next.
> > >
> > > Could you please pull:
> > >
> > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git
> > > linux-next-initial-domain-v4
> > >
> > > it contains both series rebased on Konrad's pcifront series merged on
> > > linux-next (warning: it still contains the merge commit of
> > > xen-pcifront-0.8.2 in linux-next).
> > > Let me know if you have any conflicts or if you need me to change the
> > > branch somehow.
>
> Not following the Xen develpment at all, I would like to have a positive
> reply from the listed Xen contacts, please,
>
Sure.
Jeremy?
> I do have concerns that this is turning up so late, but I realise that
> that is mainly due to a misunderstanding on the part of some of the Xen
> community.
>
Thank you very much for understanding!
> Also, the above tree is based on next-20101019 which means that I cannot
> use it as is. All the trees merged into linux-next must be base on some
> other stable tree (almost always Linus' tree). linux-next is rebuilt
> from scratch every day, so I cannot ever include a previous day's version.
>
> Merging in other stable trees is OK (as long as the other maintainer is
> aware of that and makes sure that their tree does not reabse).
>
> Basically what you send to me should be what you intend to send to Linus
> during the next merge window.
All right.
I merged Jeremy's and Konrad's branches (the ones you just merged on
linux-next) on top of linux 2.6.36 rc8, then I rebased my series on top
of the result.
Please checkout this branch:
git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git
2.6.36-rc8-initial-domain-v5
and let me know if it is suitable, it shouldn't have any merge
conflicts.
Cheers,
Stefano
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home