At 00:35 +0100 on 15 Oct (1287102942), Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 02:07 AM, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > At 17:48 +0100 on 13 Oct (1286992083), Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >>> There was a paper about this at OSDI last week:
> >>> http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi10/tech/full_papers/Broomhead.pdf
> >> Ooh, look, RADclock, just what I was thinking about.
> > Yes, it looks pretty good. Also they can use Xen stime as the local
> > oscillator and distribute drift numbers from xenstore, so no hypervisor
> > patches (and no hypervisor-interface changes) required. :)
>
> Neat! Is it something we should encourage them to submit for xen-unstable?
Well I did, but there are no hypervisor patches. :)
CC'ing the speaker: are there any dom0 tools or kernel patches we could
be looking at for xen-unstable?
Regards,
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering
Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home