WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] capturing SIGKILL in DomU

Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] capturing SIGKILL in DomU
From: "Srujan D. Kotikela" <ksrujandas@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:21:56 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:22:52 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=6ldTC5mgSHRxYSDvTj4bqbc72praoN/FmOh4z5+SE90=; b=wBzFGJjenxkJLTY6Z82Hr+hFoYEaEqOjL85IOc8105cZ1R00YlM4CY7eTF/wrnZPAx 4lR8YtKAa1QcSJgJPMAiI+ox8IJbQ99qXWmeZhUZdf9vMWNfOwbabO193eA7pUjtI4vE aoJinTu1cBdR+wzvezwj8P1MV+5x6Oo30wDZ4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; b=P4Iitkz4C+eED+dknkudGB8F76tgfxGlEIAVrOESlOpX/AcJdRhiKa/qCKyJamW77S 70kEkstLXzGO5kNMfArDr98ByxH3yNany1t20LjgxG4EiJVqLXr8yZSWk5SJnhMmCvHa irrH2SEkxGJnDFo8SAEfSEMR8E7VVC3bqUG04=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4CAB2D01.9010106@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTi=0bFWS0zOrD49b5iDaG3y7K_90UBCOJ+RieUvj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CAAE39C.1020708@xxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin7wzK4qnUageGQFw5P3jwd6YRjok1Pgm-rjZz-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CAB26AA.6040300@xxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimqkz-uzMqNayer_YUrrs+WZRky3wjoBaSBV267@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CAB2D01.9010106@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Michal,

Thanks for those suggestions. Will look into xs_watch() and get back to you. Any pointers for the documentation would be appreciated.
thanks again.

--
Srujan D. Kotikela


On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Michal Novotny <minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Srujan,
basically this would be the trigger-like mechanism using the xenstore since it's using the xenstore watch facility itself if you implement it as I recommend. I'm not suggesting using the polling via xs_read() but you may study how to establish the xs_watch. This is being done, for example, by qemu-dm for looking for pci_ins/pci_del �and USB hotplug stuff using the xenstore_process_dm_command_event() function being called from the xenstore_process_event for the XS_WATCH_TOKEN vector - see tools/ioemu-dir/xenstore.c for reference.

I think this method is OK since it's already used for watching the hot-plug/hot-unplug stuff by the device model itself. Nevertheless I don't know what exactly do you want to do and maybe it's better to modify the hypervisor for your purpose but like I say, I don't know the purpose why you need this. All I'm saying it that this communication can be achieved using the xenstore watch implementation of the user-space stack which is being used for hot-plugging/hot-unplugging stuff already.

Regards,
Michal



On 10/05/2010 03:36 PM, Srujan D. Kotikela wrote:
Hi Michal,

I would prefer an trigger-like mechanism for communication rather a a process where I have to constantly poll or look for an event in DomU. How computing intensive would be xenstore lookup compared to event-channels with 100s of DomUs?

How about modifying hypervisor to do an upcall for the event handler in Dom0 when a specific interrupt occurs in DomU? If this can be done can you suggest any pointers for the same?

Thanks for your help.

--
Srujan D. Kotikela


On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Michal Novotny <minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

� �Hi Srujan,

� �I'm not that familiar with event channels themselves however I was
� �thinking about using xenstore. You can modify the device model
� �(qemu-dm) to be watching some entry in the xenstore and the
� �communication could be both way since if you establish a xenstore
� �watch in both Dom0 and DomU you could intercept the changes on
� �both sides.

� �If you would like to use interrupts instead you may have to modify
� �the HVMLoader source codes at tools/firmware/hvmloader of the
� �user-space stack but I think using the xenstore could do the job
� �since this is how it's working with PV drivers AFAIK since PV
� �drivers themselves implement xenbus to connect to host's xenstore
� �facility.

� �Hope this helps!

� �Cheers,
� �Michal


� �On 10/05/2010 03:14 PM, Srujan D. Kotikela wrote:

� � � �Hi Michal,

� � � �I have no special interest in SIGKILL. All I want to do is
� � � �notify Dom0 about an event in DomU (I don't need to pass any
� � � �data). I am trying to indicate events by signals or
� � � �interrupts. It means, if a "particular" interrupt has occurred
� � � �in DomU, the Dom0 should be notified. Is there any other way
� � � �of doing the same other than using event channels?

� � � �I am successful in establishing the event channel. But I am
� � � �not quite sure how to send a notification that an event
� � � �occurred in DomU to Dom0. Any pointers for the same would be
� � � �appreciated.

� � � �--
� � � �Srujan D. Kotikela


� � � �On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Michal Novotny
� � � �<minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>
� � � �<mailto:minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:

� � � � � Hi Srujan,
� � � � � what about adding a signal handler to qemu-dm in the
� � � � � tools/ioemu-dir of the user-space tools? Using the signal()
� � � �API?
� � � � � Nevertheless why would you like to catch SIGKILL? This one
� � � �(as can
� � � � � be seen using included program source and killing it using
� � � �kill -9
� � � � � pid or kill -SIGKILL pid) is not being caught at all
� � � �nevertheless
� � � � � most of the other signals can be caught.

� � � � � This is the source of the example mentioned:
� � � � � #include <stdio.h>
� � � � � #include <signal.h>
� � � � � #include <stdlib.h>

� � � � � void sig_handler(int sig) {
� � � � � � �fprintf(stderr, "Signal %d caught.\n", sig);
� � � � � � �exit(sig);
� � � � � }

� � � � � int main()
� � � � � {
� � � � � � �signal(SIGINT, sig_handler);
� � � � � � �signal(SIGKILL, sig_handler);

� � � � � � �sleep(10000);
� � � � � � �return 0;
� � � � � }

� � � � � When I did try SIGINT (Ctrl + C or kill -2 pid) it caught the
� � � � � signal well but when I did try kill -9 pid (or kill
� � � �-SIGKILL pid
� � � � � respectively) it was not working at all since it killed the
� � � � � process instead of going to the signal handler. When you
� � � �need to
� � � � � catch signals like interruption signal (Ctrl + C one) this will
� � � � � work fine.

� � � � � Michal


� � � � � On 10/04/2010 09:03 PM, Srujan D. Kotikela wrote:

� � � � � � � Hi,

� � � � � � � I am trying to capture SIGKILL through event channel.

� � � � � � � On my Dom0, the following process is running (remaining
� � � �code
� � � � � � � in attachment).


� � � � � � � � �int main(void){

� � � � � � � � � � �int ret, dom, remote_dom;

� � � � � � � � � � �//initialize domains
� � � � � � � � � � �dom=0;
� � � � � � � � � � �remote_dom=2;

� � � � � � � � � � �//create the event channel
� � � � � � � � � � �ret = create_channel(dom, remote_dom);


� � � � � � � � � � �if (0 == ret) {
� � � � � � � � � � � � �printf("\n Event Channel established
� � � �successfully \n");
� � � � � � � � � � �} else {
� � � � � � � � � � � � �return -1; � �//EVENT_CHANNEL_CREATION_FAILED
� � � � � � � � � � �}

� � � � � � � � � � �//wait 20 seconds for an event to occur in DomU
� � � � � � � � � � �wait_for_event(20);

� � � � � � � � � � �//close the opened interfaces
� � � � � � � � � � �close_channel();

� � � � � � � � � � �return 0;

� � � � � � � � �}


� � � � � � � While this process is running; I killed a process in DomU
� � � � � � � using `*kill SIGKILL pid*`

� � � � � � � How can I capture this event (occured in DomU) at the
� � � �Dom0. I
� � � � � � � watched /dev/xen/evtchn, but no notification.


� � � � � � � --
� � � � � � � Srujan D. Kotikela


� � � � � � � _______________________________________________
� � � � � � � Xen-devel mailing list
� � � �Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
� � � �<mailto:Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
� � � �<mailto:Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
� � � �<mailto:Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>

� � � �http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



� � � � � -- � � Michal Novotny<minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx
� � � �<mailto:minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx

� � � �<mailto:minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>>>, RHCE

� � � � � Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat




� �-- � � Michal Novotny<minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>>, RHCE
� �Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat




--
Michal Novotny<minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>