Re: [Xen-devel] pv-ops domU not working with MSI interrupts on Nehalem

[Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:52:39AM -0700, Bruce Edge wrote:
>> One of our developers who is working on a tachyon driver is
>> complaining that the pvops domU kernel is not working for these MSI
>> interrupts.
>> This is using the current head of xen/2.6.32.x on both a single
>> Nahelam 920 and a dual E5540. This behavior is consistent with Xen
>> 4.0.1, 4.0.2.rc1-pre and 4.1.
>
>
> I just checked on my SuperMicro X8DTN, this combination
>  - For Dom0, git commit fe999249 (2.6.32.18)
>  - For DomU, devel/xen-pcifront-0.6 or devel/xen-pcifront-0.7
>  - For Hypervisor I used cs 21976, but found that the latest (22155) works too

Perfect! That's all I need - a recipe that works. Thank you very much.

-Bruce

>
> with which where I passed in PCI devices with legacy IRQ, MSI, and MSI-X. I 
> tried
> a combination of doing this with IOMMU (VT-d) and without - both cases these 
> devices:
>
> 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
> Controller #1 (rev 02)
> 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
> Controller #2 (rev 02)
> 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI 
> Controller #3 (rev 02)
> 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI 
> Controller #1 (rev 02)
> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet 
> Controller (Copper) (rev 06)
> 0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit Network 
> Connection (rev 02)
>
> worked just fine (either defining pci=["..."] or just using pci-attach).
>
> But if I use the latest xen/next or xen/stable-2.6.32.x it does not look
> that happy :-(
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel