WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Performance numbers on PV-on-HVM

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Performance numbers on PV-on-HVM
From: Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:56:08 +0200
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:58:36 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009291007490.2864@kaball-desktop>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTinL1BbQ-Rvjj8g8vqkUm7JZGBpZD368PX-BLv7M@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009271055440.2864@kaball-desktop> <4CA2698B.5010901@xxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009291007490.2864@kaball-desktop>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100926 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
Il 29/09/2010 11:10, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
[cut]
> Yes, you are right.
> A little while back I backported the whole series to 2.6.32 and the
> result was included the Jeremy's pvops main branch, but I haven't kept
> it completely up to date.
> The new changes that are only in the 2.6.35-rc5-pvhvm-v7 branch regards
> PV spinlocks, the balloon driver and the PV console.

that's a good news but in my experience the pv_ops kernel is not as
stable as the suse xenified kernel
...imho the best would be to have clean patches for a 3.6.32.x vanilla
kernel ...so we can do packages close to the official ones ...with only
this great addition.

Best regards,
Christian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>