WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 12/12] xen/mtrr: Add mtrr_if support for Xen mtrr

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 12/12] xen/mtrr: Add mtrr_if support for Xen mtrr
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:19:20 -0700
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "sct@xxxxxxxxxx" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:20:11 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4CA2302C.3000201@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009281217540.2864@kaball-desktop> <1285676218-26218-12-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100928123925.GA18208@xxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009281455300.2864@kaball-desktop> <4CA2223B.9040400@xxxxxxxx> <4CA22C3C.3020209@xxxxxxxxx> <4CA2302C.3000201@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.1.3-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.3
On 09/28/2010 11:13 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>  On 09/28/2010 10:56 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 09/28/2010 10:13 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> Yes, we could just mask out the MTRR CPU feature and rely entirely on PAT.
>>>
>>> The alternative would be to use the wrmsr hooks to emulate the Intel
>>> MTRR registers by mapping them to hypercalls, but that seems needlessly
>>> complex.
>>>
>> Indeed.  Relying on pure PAT is the Right Thing[TM].
> 
> Is there a plan to formally deprecate /proc/mtrr and the kernel
> infrastructure behind it?
> 

No, and we really can't do it for a couple of reasons:

a) Pre-PAT hardware;
b) MTRRs and PAT interact on hardware;
c) MTRRs, but not PAT, interact with SMM.

However, since a virtual machine like Xen doesn't have these issues, it
doesn't apply.

        -hpa

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>