| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] RFC: automatic NUMA placement
I am in favor of this being optional rather than default.
It is another case of the tradeoff between performance
and flexibility that I have ranted about several times
on xen-devel, and Xen's policy seems to be fairly random
(sometimes Xen chooses performance over flexibility and
sometimes the opposite).
I went looking through xen-devel archives for a previous
discussion on this (and to find when the code got added)
but couldn't find it... if you have links to the patch
and discussion, please post.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Gross [mailto:juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 7:39 AM
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-devel] RFC: automatic NUMA placement
>
> Hi,
>
> I just stumbled upon the automatic pinning of vcpus on domain creation
> in
> case of NUMA.
> This behaviour is questionable IMO, as it breaks correct handling of
> scheduling weights on NUMA machines.
> I would suggest to switch this feature off per default and make it a
> configuration option of xend. It would make sense, however, to change
> cpu pool
> processor allocation to be NUMA-aware.
> Switching NUMA off via boot option would remove NUMA-optimized memory
> allocation, which would be sub-optimal :-)
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Juergen
>
> --
> Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems
> TSP ES&S SWE OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
> Fujitsu Technology Solutions e-mail:
> juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Domagkstr. 28 Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
> D-80807 Muenchen Company details:
> ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home