WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualiztion: hap-on-hap

from [Dong, Eddie] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualiztion: hap-on-hap
From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:45:16 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 02:51:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100913092828.GA3844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <201009011718.44873.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> <20100908140451.GA23487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201009091601.04316.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B22A86CEE7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100910100309.GB29761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B22A86D875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100913092828.GA3844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: ActTJghRsBykcdVWQPiPzsMJg7hYZwAAktzg
Thread-topic: [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualiztion: hap-on-hap 
>>> Maybe we could use n0, n1, n2 for nesting levels instead?
>>> 
>> Or l1g, l2g? Anyway, either is better to me and up to your decision.
> 
> I think I prefer n1, n2 - just because it's shorter. :)
> 
FIne. Will follow in VMX side.

Eddie


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] Build fail on stable-2.6.32-x, Jiang, Yunhong
Next by Date:  [Xen-devel] terminology of nestedhvm, Dong, Eddie
Previous by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualiztion: hap-on-hap, Tim Deegan
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualiztion: hap-on-hap, Tim Deegan
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy