WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: BUG with Xen 4.0.1 and PVOPS 2.6.32.21 / acpi_ex_system_

To: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: BUG with Xen 4.0.1 and PVOPS 2.6.32.21 / acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 13:09:57 +0300
Cc: jeremy <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:15:11 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20857875.511283767501607.JavaMail.root@uhura>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20857875.511283767501607.JavaMail.root@uhura>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:05:01PM +0200, Carsten Schiers wrote:
>    Hi,
> 
>    I did setup a new testing system for Xen/Pvops. It's an Asrock P5B-DE with
>    E2200 CPU.
>    I installed Debian Lenny 5.0.5 64 Bit and compiled Xen 4.0.1 according to
>    Pasi's Xen4
>    XenWiki page, fetched latest 2.6.32 pvops Kernel according to the PvOps
>    XenWiki
>    page, which was a 2.6.32.18 and is now a 2.6.32.21.
> 
>    I managed to set up serial debugging, so that I can provide the attached
>    logs. If you need
>    more, let me know.
> 
>    I sent this already to Jeremy, but Pasi recommended to send it to
>    Xen-Devel also. Jeremy,
>    sorry, I mixed numbers a bit. We are speaking about 2.6.32 (xen/stable, I
>    guess).
> 

Yeah, _looks_ like something that should be easy to sort out.
Did you take a look at that code from the kernel source? 

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>