| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2061: regressions - FAIL
On Friday, 03 September 2010 at 18:41, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Brendan Cully writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2061:
> regressions - FAIL"):
> > Or, instead of removing features, maybe your test scripts could just
> > not use -j4, or explicitly build the kernel first, until Jeremy gets
> > around to doing the merge?
>
> Not using -j4 is out of the question. And I don't want to make the
> situation with building kernels out of the xen tree in my test system
> any worse than it is already. I'm intending to get rid of that
> entirely. Hopefully we can get rid of it in xen-unstable at some
> point too.
Until the kernel modules are in their proper place, I think a less
drastic fix for your test suites would be to edit
tools/remus/kmod/Makefile and change
test -d $(KERNELDIR)
to
test -f $(KERNELDIR)/Module.symvers
which will still silently fail to build the modules if tools/remus
builds too early, but should suppress failure warnings. Completely
untested.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home