WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backw

from [Ian Jackson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:34:14 +0100
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:34:51 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4C51AC7B.4060006@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1280246290.5872.8932.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19536.21817.469833.377542@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C505E9E.2090109@xxxxxxxx> <19537.38227.38120.755998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007291600030.19809@kaball-desktop> <19537.41521.772417.34655@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007291657550.19809@kaball-desktop> <19537.42963.743949.157090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007291713250.19809@kaball-desktop> <4C51AC7B.4060006@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, 
PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc"):
> I wonder if blkfront could register itself with the scsi subsystem 
> rather than directly as a block device?

I bet that would mean it would have to deal with SCSI command blocks
and stuff, so I doubt it.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy