| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 9] libxl: return libxl_dominfo from libxl_ev
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 17:38 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 9] libxl: return
> libxl_dominfo from libxl_event_get_domain_death_info"):
> > enum alone would OK, but most header files contains other stuff as well,
> > so including features.h would be fine but including platform.h would not.
> > In order to have a clear policy we should just say that including Xen
> > header files should be avoided.
>
> I don't think there is any difficulty with libxl callers #including
> Xen public header files, no matter that those Xen header files have
> lots of other stuff in that is not relevant to them.
>
> It's not as if #including the Xen public headers exposes functions for
> making hypercalls, or indeed any functions or objects at all.
In my repost of the series I will use the SHUTDOWN_* values from
sched.h. We can always update it if consensus goes the other way.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home