WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] HVM guests are allowed to use the entire vir

To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] HVM guests are allowed to use the entire virtual address space for
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:57:30 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:18:40 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100726100006.GT13291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acssqbfob2WgUjq3QLGoY9a5eDIFPAAB5+kE
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] HVM guests are allowed to use the entire virtual address space for
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
On 26/07/2010 11:00, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> At 10:52 +0100 on 26 Jul (1280141550), Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 05/25/2010 04:49 PM, Tim Deegan wrote:
>>> whatever they want, without any Xen hole.  __addr_ok() is therefore
>>> always true for such guests.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Sorry for picking up yet another old patch after two months. :)
>> 
>> Do you have a testcase for this or the other patch in the thread?
> 
> I'm afraid not - this was a very old patch that had been gathering dust
> at the bottom of the XenServer code base.  Calling
> e.g. GNTTABOP_setup_table from inside a HVM guest with the frame_list
> argument somewhere in the Xen virtual address space should trigger it,
> though.

The patch never got applied (to xen-unstable) by the way. We agreed on
xen-unstable:21456, which was a more targeted bug fix.

 -- Keir

> Cheers,
> 
> Tim.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>