On 06/19/2010 10:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 06:40:10PM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> On 06/19/2010 05:22 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 04:48:46PM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 06/19/2010 04:41 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:56:38AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 10 May 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/10/2010 07:41 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 May 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On one of my host machines, in PV guests using pvfb I get proper
>>>>>>>>> absolute mouse tracking.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On another host machine, I get relative tracking in pvfb-using guests.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Both are using identical versions of Fedora 12, identical domain
>>>>>>>>> configs, and toolstacks and kernels built from the same source. The
>>>>>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>> files of the X servers are more or less identical.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Help? Any clues?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> relative vs absolute depends on a node on xenstore called
>>>>>>>> "request-abs-pointer" that defaults to 0 and has to be written by the
>>>>>>>> guest.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, it looks like it is being set, but the guest is still showing
>>>>>>> relative behaviour:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vkbd = ""
>>>>>>> 0 = ""
>>>>>>> backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/vkbd/5/0"
>>>>>>> backend-id = "0"
>>>>>>> state = "4"
>>>>>>> page-ref = "1137660"
>>>>>>> event-channel = "11"
>>>>>>> request-abs-pointer = "1"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does this mean qemu-dm's vnc server is not doing the right thing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think is probably xenfb (that is the framebuffer backend in qemu) that
>>>>>> is not doing the right thing.
>>>>>> Try adding some debug output in hw/xenfb.c:input_connect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Jeremy: Did you figure this out? I'm again seeing this problem on my
>>>>> Fedora 13 + Xen 4.0.1-rc3-pre box..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, that should be fixed in current xen-unstable - it was a xenbus
>>>> race-condition. What guest are you seeing it in? I've found that I
>>>> still don't get absolute pointers in Centos guests.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yeah, it's a CentOS 5.5 guest that gets relative pointer on my Fedora 13
>>> dom0.
>>> On a CentOS5 dom0 it gets absolute though..
>>>
>>> Fedora 13 guest gets absolute pointer on my Fedora 13 dom0..
>>>
>>>
>> Huh, that is interesting. Maybe there's still a race or something there...
>>
>>
> Yeah.. maybe. Note that I'm running Xen 4.0.1-rc3-pre and not xen-unstable..
>
I just got a Win7 hvm domain working for the first time in a while, and
found that it *isn't* getting proper abs updates. I even set
usbdevice='tablet' in its config...
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|