WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] blktap2 bug:Assertion 'list_empty(&vreq->next)' failed

To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] blktap2 bug:Assertion 'list_empty(&vreq->next)' failed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:26:05 -0700
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tsk <aixt2006@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:27:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1278365159.375.7049.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTilRxxBwgwKD7_e2pWatmo38h7ufrclxgRCfYhcV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1277700560.9747.1899.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTilJ1R3TpKfW_l8lKvtNRHxPXc6TP2XZB5aWSjDh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1277701807.9747.1905.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikcN8oX-LG8bhsa8CQJTjn1CLFvNuwkThMSb5yR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1278365159.375.7049.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4
On 07/05/2010 02:25 PM, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 08:55 -0400, tsk wrote:
>   
>> Hi, will the patches be added to Xen-4.1?
>>     
> About to prepare the next bunch of patches for xen.git.
>
> Jeremy, is it okay to pull some of the changes made for 2.6.3x into the
> xen/dom0/backend/blktap2 topic branch before moving on?
>
> I'm mainly talking about this one:
>
> >From ab77527f9a63a5c657c6d6a50e70a66adceaa3a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:22:09 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] xen/blktap2: make compile
>
> and a couple related deltas which came later.
>
> Except moving forward to newer blk queue interfaces, they don't make
> much of a functional difference.
>
> Would simplify merging quite a bit.
>   

Which kernel version has these interface updates?  Do they predate the
version the blktap2 branch is rooted on, or do the come later?  If
they're later, then merge the mainline kernel (ideally a tagged release
like v2.6.3[12]) into the blktap2 one and cherrypick the "make compile"
changes on top of the merge (and if they're already there, then just
cherrypick).

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>