WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] help with xenstored 'hang'

To: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] help with xenstored 'hang'
From: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:15:25 -0600
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:18:17 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
I'm trying to debug an 'xm list' hang on a large (~700 hosts) Xen 3.2
production installation.  The hang occurs randomly, on a random host. 
User has provided cores of xend and xenstored processes when hang
occurs.  After poking at these cores I have discovered

In xend process, a thread is blocked on a cond variable, waiting for a
response to XS_TRANSACTION_START from xenstored. A reader thread
responsible for reading from xenstored is blocked on read(2).

In the xenstored process, the lone thread is blocked on select(2),
waiting for IO. I examined the connections list and see that it contains
a connection for the XS_TRANSACTION_START request.  Dumping the
connection object:

(gdb) p *(struct connection *)0x526c70
$48 = {list = {next = 0x517c30, prev = 0x5151f0}, fd = 13, id = 0,
can_write =
true, in = 0x523600,
out_list = {next = 0x526c98, prev = 0x526c98}, transaction = 0x0,
transaction_list = {next = 0x523560,
prev = 0x523560}, next_transaction_id = 60231445, transaction_started = 1,
domain = 0x0, watches = {
next = 0x51daa0, prev = 0x5267b0}, write = 0x402460 <writefd>, read =
0x405180 <readfd>}

Notice transaction_started is set to 1, but out_list is empty. AFAICT,
that means the reply has been sent to xend. The reader thread in xend
should have received the response and signaled the cond variable -
allowing execution to progress. Ultimately, xend would send a
XS_TRANSACTION_END message, freeing the connection object in xenstored
and removing it from connections list.

Does my understanding of this code sound correct?  Anyone have
suggestions or further debugging tips?  Examining cores is about my only
debug option as user does not want to deploy debug patches, enable
tracing, etc. across 700 hosts.

Interestingly, when user strace's or attaches to xenstored process with
gdb, xenstored "awakes", the hung 'xm list' returns, and xenstored
continues normally.  A new connection to xenstored (e.g. running xmtop)
seems to poke it along as well.  Would a timeout on select(2) in main
loop of xenstored help at all?

Thanks for any insights!
Jim



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>