WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencommons: modprobe xenfs if it not be loaded

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencommons: modprobe xenfs if it not be loaded
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:13:12 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yu Zhiguo <yuzg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:14:41 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C8455FC4.181C7%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C8455FC4.181C7%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4
On 06/21/2010 06:28 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 21/06/2010 15:05, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencommons: modprobe
>> xenfs if it not be loaded"):
>>     
>>> It should just be sufficient to explicitly mount /proc/xen, which will
>>> trigger a modprobe if necessary.
>>>       
>> That sounds like a Nak of the patch to me.  Unfortunately it has
>> already been applied (21641).
>>     
> I can revert it.
>   

I think so.

> Should I leave tools patches unapplied for a week, perhaps?
>   

You mean the policy is that if a patch is not interesting enough to draw
comment, you'll accept it by default after a week?  What about waiting
until there are either positive or negative comments, and suggesting the
poster ping if the patch is uncommented on after a day or two?

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel