Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-unstable save error

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21/06/2010 14:37, "Michal Novotny" <minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> My guest is RHEL-5 i386 guest but this seems that the suspend port is
> missing. AFAIK, you started using the SUSPEND_CANCEL some time ago which
> requires the modified kernel.
> 
> Isn't it possible that's the issue or how is it with the SUSPEND_CANCEL
> functionality?

SUSPEND_CANCEL is a different thing. The suspend port is simply a quicker
way for suspend notifications to be passed back and forth between the guest
and the dom0 toolstack. We fall back okay if the guest kernel does not
support the new faster method.

I'm not sure why the domain restore operation fails. Unfortunately some
error messages are now expected in the logs, since Remus functionality went
into the tree. So it's hard to work out what the first error is.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel