 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ? |
| From: | Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 May 2010 15:37:26 -0700 |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 28 May 2010 15:38:22 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=o5tiKmXtAeEtCUtkogYvL+w0x+PmdSeFa6S8s9v3bZk=; b=VTmMhIw5brIirLg49gVVjaL/OKhRewD/6+9rRlpwXLuga/4Kwv6wDVnroSLF8eLGaC ew6Fs10m433w9DIH2DtCi8z3wrDi5ptJOqj4hnoQCswxgnNlbtcQs1gKY2KAUKwOcRQ/ t45s5UyVqvY0AsI8GAoR6+7283nNqPFld20SQ= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SRgx5sD//6rt0G8tWpNKrw8Dn783BuQEYO8MjuKz5QKgf8MX0fqQGLtN6uC5YOPKX5 pUvCDhYGmWhQoYMWsIZckw2hbcwYhLArpr9yfXFwRkUETfLRjiy5PFz7Q/Y41kVjCw3w d1OgrtSt9H+bnHJbQ2FGOlBAYjiPRHhR1+RBM= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
If we are to add new guest configuration parameters, is it enough to make it work with xl ? Sorry, if I missed any past mails regarding this, but (in general) should people think xl or xm or both ? -dulloor _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] What's the rationale for change d1efaaee441b "xend: Dis-allow device assignment if PoD is enabled."?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?, Stefano Stabellini |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] What's the rationale for change d1efaaee441b "xend: Dis-allow device assignment if PoD is enabled."?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?, Stefano Stabellini |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
