xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC
On 28/05/2010 07:29, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It is impossible to meet that level of TSC consistency when doing CPU
>> physical-add, without emulating all guest TSCs. We may need to add that as
>> an option, at least, to keep a small class of apps that care (like Oracle's
>> DB, we assume) happy.
>
> So a option to make TSC_MODE_DEFAULT as d->arch.vtsc=0 ?.
> When CPU_hotadd, we should at least warning if that option is not set, am I
> right?
Xen-unstable:21469.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
|
|
|