 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Cpupools and pdata_alloc
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Cpupools and pdata_alloc |
| From: | George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 May 2010 12:47:51 -0500 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 10 May 2010 10:48:28 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tF2APtK2nGA9ZebLaxAEGXophFd7gjJjdbz/ROl/uJ0=; b=S4p7Z9S9PraD9hQq2rPwIljq/SjOR9MV1V+xnS6c1R2qrDQNLd86s6UzvWAgYZuLva gT7h4AE5sLB/3Val6kKY82JZ8Od9d2Xk6spYv31NydQn4I47Z4ncG8OJnNtpDRnP79R8 yU02ZsVugmFmPljpBvqH3zguDNXgLnhOjzPcY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=VHhzkXMkOYa/oXfL2SQ3WzWiGBpEKw5Nl1hXcug8r99EjX9OF5kox50Gk3O4Sw95X4 rIxPCgEPuessWf85z+lR1nIi/PJkxr5OadY6nlVxuz+QaXYiiceCjQSXN56F+AwWnfBg 3a/Y0L9XPcW9qBY8u9mG5dz6Y7D3oD+eyNjBk= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
It appears that in the new cpupools code: * pdata_allocate is called from alloc_vcpu() with that cpu for the first time. * this happens usually when dom0's cpus are allocated, as it cycles through all of the cpus This seems a bit strange to me. Wouldn't it make more sense to pass, or to make available, a cpumask of the cpus in a pool to the init function? Also, is there documentation of the cpupool lifecycle anywhere, to help scheduler writers understand what's going on? -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] pvfb: Absolute vs relative mouse tracking mystery, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] RE: AMD Phenom II 940: Upgrade to 2.6.32.12 fixes it and upgrades CPU from 3.1Ghz to 1.2Thz!, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
| Previous by Thread: | [mdlabriola@xxxxxxxxx: [Xen-devel] Re: Re: [Xen-users] DomU routed traffic disappearing in vif.], Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Cpupools and pdata_alloc, Juergen Gross |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
