WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] tsc_mode == 1 and hvm guests

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] tsc_mode == 1 and hvm guests
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 07:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:01:19 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C80DBDC5.13CF6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005101341270.11380@kaball-desktop C80DBDC5.13CF6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is it an objective for hybrid VMs to work on 4.0.1?
I think the fix only is required for hybrid VM's
and the rest is cleanup.  Is that correct, Stefano?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 6:42 AM
> To: Stefano Stabellini; Dan Magenheimer
> Cc: Zhang, Xiantao; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Xu, Dongxiao
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] tsc_mode == 1 and hvm guests
> 
> On 10/05/2010 13:41, "Stefano Stabellini"
> <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 7 May 2010, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> >> Hi Stefano --
> >>
> >> Eyeballing the patch looks good to me.  Have you
> >> verified HVM save/restore/migration works (to physical
> >> machine with different TSC rate)?
> >
> > Yes, it seems to work fine.
> 
> Is the patch suitable for Xen 4.0.1 do you think?
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel