Re: [Xen-devel] Sixth (and final?) release candidate for Xen 3.4.3

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/05/2010 00:11, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> As I know, you have to backport extra Csets like 28089, 21092, and 21161
>>> from
>>> xen-unstable.hg to make it work well with latest pv_ops kernel except the
>>> Csets Keir had indicated.
>>>     
>> Doesn't sound like 3.4.3 is going to support pv_ops then.
>>   
> 
> Florian and M A Young have reported success with 3.4.3-rc, so it isn't
> completely non-functional.  How essential are those changes?   28089
> doesn't appear in my tree ("abort: unknown revision '28089'"), but 21092
> ("Allow all unused GSI to be configured via IO-APIC by new pv_ops dom0")
> and 21161 ("Make c/s 21089 work again with c/s 21092") both look pertient.

I doubt anyone is running pv_ops dom0 in serious production uses yet. So I'm
not sure backporting this sort of stuff to our very stable branch is really
necessary. Anyone running pv_ops dom0 is likely not scared of Xen 4.0.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel