|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact
On 06/05/2010 10:25, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yes, most definitely. They are cheap and should be added unconditionally to
>> the handler if you go this route.
>
> Hmm, smp_call_function_interrupt() for example also doesn't do this
> unconditionally, so I'd prefer having them only in the unlikely code
> path.
Well, it doesn't matter much either way. Whatever makes the code simpler.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] reduce 'd' debug key's global impact, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|