Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 6] evtchn delivery on HVM

> >  * How should CPU0 event-channel notifications be delivered?
> > + * val[63:56] == 0: val[55:0] is a delivery GSI (Global System
> > Interrupt).
> > + * val[63:56] == 1: val[55:0] is a delivery PCI INTx line, as follows:
> > + *                  Domain = val[47:32], Bus  = val[31:16],
> > + *                  DevFn  = val[15: 8], IntX = val[ 1: 0]
> > + * If val == 0 then CPU0 event-channel notifications are not delivered.
> > 
> > I don't see val[63:56] == 2 ?
> > 
> 
> the comment on the other patch needs to be update as well

Yup, and it looks that this also needs a patch to xen-unstable.hg as that
header file is missing this data too.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 6] evtchn delivery on HVM, Stefano Stabellini Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 6] evtchn delivery on HVM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 6] evtchn delivery on HVM, Stefano Stabellini Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 6] evtchn delivery on HVM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 6] early PV on HVM, Stefano Stabellini

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 04/18] Nested Virtualization: p2m cleanup, Christoph Egger

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 6] evtchn delivery on HVM, Stefano Stabellini

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 6] xen pci platform device driver, Stefano Stabellini

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]