|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time
On 20/04/2010 17:05, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Resend.
>
> CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time
>
> Try to reduce spin_lock overhead for deep C state entry/exit. This will
> benefit systems with a lot of cpus which need the hpet broadcast to wakeup
> from deep C state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
I was going to ask: do you still get the decent power-saving win from this
new version of the patch? You acquire/release the lock a lot more
potentially in this version, since you do so inside the loop over cpumask in
handle_hpet_broadcast().
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Wei, Gang
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Wei, Gang
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Wei, Gang
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Wei, Gang
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Wei, Gang
|
|
|
|
|