Re: [Xen-devel] future plans for libxl?

[Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 15/04/10 14:53, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Perhaps rather than expecting the libxl caller to include
> xen/include/public/version.h, it would be better to have a single
> libxc call that fills in a single structure by making all the relevant
> calls and copying the data out.
>
> Vincent, Stefano, what do you think ?
>    
That's fine if it happens, but it's not like it's performance critical 
or will ever be.
not adding a new version hypercall and doing it in a series of 
hypercalls, means
that the code stays compatible with old hypervisor.

--
Vincent

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel