WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 pvo

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 pvops kernels
From: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:32:44 +0200
Cc: jeremy <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "konrad.wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:33:48 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I thought so, too, but this doesn't work either. And: it does work in 2.6.18, as
I think it's not realy two devices. One is OHCI, the other EHCI.

BR,
Carsten.

----- Originalnachricht -----
Von: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Gesendet: Mon, 12.4.2010 15:07
An: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: jeremy <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> ; xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ; 
konrad.wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Re: Re: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 
pvops kernels

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 03:01:33PM +0200, Carsten Schiers wrote:
> Yet another note: the kernel messages that break 00:02.0 come up when I use 
> 2.6.31 kernel,
> that means, if it is passing through the 00:02.1 into the pvops DomU, it will 
> break 00:02.0.
> 
> Please note that this will work with 2.6.18.8
> 

Maybe both of these devices need to be passed through at the same time to the 
same guest, 
since they're part of the same device? 

-- Pasi


> BR,
> Carsten.
> 
> ----- Originalnachricht -----
> Von: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Son, 11.4.2010 16:45
> An: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: jeremy <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> ; konrad.wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Betreff: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 
> pvops kernels
> 
> Two additional infos: here lspci of the two USB controllers. The 00:02.0 is 
> passed into another DomU. I 
> should mention that I think the 00:02.0 is going down in case I pass 00:02.1 
> into the 2.6.32 domain, but
> not if I pass it into the 2.6.31 domain. Find what the other DomU says below.
> 
> 00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP65 USB Controller (rev a3) 
> (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
>         Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device 5004
>         Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
>         Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- 
> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>         Latency: 0 (750ns min, 250ns max)
>         Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 21
>         Region 0: Memory at c0200000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
>         Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
>                 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA 
> PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
>                 Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
>         Kernel driver in use: pciback
>         Kernel modules: ohci-hcd
> 
> 00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP65 USB Controller (rev a3) 
> (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
>         Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device 5004
>         Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
>         Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- 
> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>         Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 20
>         Region 0: Memory at c0201000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] 
> [size=256]
>         Capabilities: [44] Debug port: BAR=1 offset=0098
>         Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
>                 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA 
> PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
>                 Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME+
>         Kernel driver in use: pciback
>         Kernel modules: ehci-hcd
> 
> Apr 11 16:27:26 uhura kernel: fcusb: Rx URB status: -110
> Apr 11 16:27:26 uhura kernel: usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 3
> Apr 11 16:27:26 uhura kernel: kcapi: card 1 down.
> Apr 11 16:27:26 uhura kernel: kcapi: Controller 1: fcusb-0003 unregistered
> Apr 11 16:27:26 uhura kernel: fcusb: Driver 'fcusb' detached
> Apr 11 16:27:26 uhura kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using 
> ohci_hcd and address 4
> Apr 11 16:27:27 uhura kernel: usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> Apr 11 16:27:27 uhura kernel: fcusb: Driver 'fcusb' attached to stack. (152)
> Apr 11 16:27:27 uhura kernel: fcusb: Stack version 3.11-04
> Apr 11 16:27:27 uhura kernel: kcapi: Controller 1: fcusb-0004 attached
> Apr 11 16:27:27 uhura kernel: kcapi: card 1 "fcusb-0004" ready.
> Apr 11 16:28:24 uhura kernel: fcusb: Rx URB status: -110
> Apr 11 16:28:24 uhura kernel: usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 4
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: kcapi: card 1 down.
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: kcapi: Controller 1: fcusb-0004 unregistered
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: fcusb: Driver 'fcusb' detached
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using 
> ohci_hcd and address 5
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: fcusb: Driver 'fcusb' attached to stack. (152)
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: fcusb: Stack version 3.11-04
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: kcapi: Controller 1: fcusb-0005 attached
> Apr 11 16:28:25 uhura kernel: kcapi: card 1 "fcusb-0005" ready.
> 
> BR,
> Carsten.
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Carsten Schiers 
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. April 2010 16:33
> An: xen-devel
> Cc: jeremy; konrad.wilk
> Betreff: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 
> pvops kernels
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am sorry to say that I mixed something. What does work now is 
> 2.6.31.13 kernel. The error
> messages are gone now for 2.6.32.11, but it is still not functioning. 
> 
> So, with the 2.6.32.11 kernel, it will not recognize the same USB 
> controller that is recognized 
> by 2.6.31.13. 
> 
> When booting:
> 
> [    0.168388] pcifront pci-0: Creating PCI Frontend Bus 0000:00
> [    0.325746]   alloc irq_desc for 503 on node 0
> [    0.325753]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 0
> 
> When I detach and attach from Dom0, it will log in the DomU:
> 
> [  202.660279] pcifront pci-0: Rescanning PCI Frontend Bus 0000:00
> [  202.848550] pcifront pci-0: backend going away!
> [  202.857153] pcifront pci-0: Disconnecting PCI Frontend Buses
> [  202.903310] pcifront pci-0: 22 freeing event channel 9
> [  224.234600] pcifront pci-0: Installing PCI frontend
> [  224.237069] pcifront pci-0: Creating PCI Frontend Bus 0000:00
> 
> In Dom0 we have:
> 
> ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:00:02.1 disabled
> pciback: vpci: 0000:00:02.1: assign to virtual slot 0
> 
> For reference, the log entries when I detach/attach the device in 
> 2.6.31.13:
> 
> [   47.250686] usb usb1: USB disconnect, address 1
> [   47.251155] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: USB bus 1 deregistered
> [   47.349616] pcifront pci-0: Rescanning PCI Frontend Bus 0000:00
> [   47.938006] pcifront pci-0: backend going away!
> [   47.941640] pcifront pci-0: Disconnecting PCI Frontend Buses
> [   47.946981] pcifront pci-0: Device is in 6 state. Need to change 
> state on the privileged domain.
> [   47.952364] pcifront pci-0: Device is in 0 state. Need to change 
> state on the privileged domain.
> [   47.957636] pcifront pci-0: 22 freeing event channel 9
> [   58.832396] pcifront pci-0: Device is in 2 state. Need to change 
> state on the privileged domain.
> [   58.840387] pcifront pci-0: Device is in 3 state. Need to change 
> state on the privileged domain.
> [   58.868584] pcifront pci-0: Installing PCI frontend
> [   58.869661] pcifront pci-0: Creating PCI Frontend Bus 0000:00
> [   59.487005] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [   59.487005] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: Xen PCI enabling IRQ: 20
> [   59.487005] xen_allocate_pirq: returning irq 20 for gsi 20
> [   59.487005] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: EHCI Host Controller
> [   59.491270] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: new USB bus registered, assigned 
> bus number 1
> [   59.491409] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: Enabling legacy PCI PM
> [   59.491462] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: debug port 1
> [   59.491534] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: irq 20, io mem 0xc0201000
> [   59.497088] ehci_hcd 0000:00:00.1: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
> [   59.497182] usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, 
> idProduct=0002
> [   59.497194] usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, 
> SerialNumber=1
> [   59.497207] usb usb1: Product: EHCI Host Controller
> [   59.497216] usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.31.13-pvops-686 
> ehci_hcd
> [   59.497228] usb usb1: SerialNumber: 0000:00:00.1
> [   59.497363] usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> [   59.497447] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
> [   59.497643] hub 1-0:1.0: 10 ports detected
> 
> Relevant XEN config entries in 2.6.32.11:
> 
> CONFIG_XEN=y
> CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=8
> CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE=y
> # CONFIG_XEN_DEBUG_FS is not set
> CONFIG_SWIOTLB_XEN=y
> CONFIG_MICROCODE_XEN=y
> CONFIG_XEN_DOM0=y
> CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST=y
> CONFIG_XEN_DOM0_PCI=y
> CONFIG_XEN_PCI_PASSTHROUGH=y
> CONFIG_PCI_XEN=y
> CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y
> CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND=y
> CONFIG_NETXEN_NIC=m
> CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND=y
> CONFIG_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND=y
> CONFIG_HVC_XEN=y
> CONFIG_XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND=y
> CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON=y
> CONFIG_XEN_SCRUB_PAGES=y
> CONFIG_XEN_DEV_EVTCHN=y
> CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND=y
> CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_BACKEND=y
> CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND=y
> CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_TAP=y
> CONFIG_XEN_BLKBACK_PAGEMAP=y
> CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND=y
> CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND_VPCI=y
> # CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND_PASS is not set
> # CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND_SLOT is not set
> # CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND_CONTROLLER is not set
> # CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BE_DEBUG is not set
> CONFIG_XENFS=y
> CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_XENFS=y
> CONFIG_XEN_SYS_HYPERVISOR=y
> CONFIG_XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND=y
> # CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV is not set
> CONFIG_XEN_S3=y
> 
> BR,
> Carsten.
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Carsten Schiers 
> Gesendet: Samstag, 10. April 2010 11:27
> An: 'Pasi Kärkkäinen'
> Cc: 'xen-devel'; 'jeremy'; 'konrad.wilk'
> Betreff: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 
> 2.6.32 pvops kernels
> 
> Hi folks, some progress:
> 
> >> PCI controller / 2nd Function? / working in xen/master-2.6.32.13, not 
> 
> >> working on xen/stable-2.6.32 on Xen 3.4.1
> >> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---------------------------------------
> >> 
> >> It will allow passthrough of all mentioned devices except one of the 
> PCI 
> >> controllers. It will not be detected. Using 
> >> xm pci-attach will produce an error:
> >> 
> >>   troi kernel: [   23.862294] ehci_hcd 0000:00:01.1: device not 
> >> available because of BAR 0 [0xfc102000-0xfc1020ff] collisions
> >>   troi kernel: [   61.942809] ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.0: device not 
> >> available because of BAR 0 [0xfc104000-0xfc104fff] collisions
> >> 
> >> I first tried only with the 2nd function (or whatever it is called), 
> but 
> >> as you see, we have the same error with both put into 
> >> the DomU.
> >>
> >
> >Have you seen this wiki page?:
> >http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPCIpassthrough
> >
> >Try the "I get "non-page-aligned MMIO BAR" error when trying to start 
> the guest" thing.. maybe it helps? 
> 
> Did so and move to Xen 3.4.3-rc4 and latest 2.6.18.8 Dom0 kernel. It 
> works now with pvops 2.6.32.10 DomU kernel!!! 
> 
> Thanks Pasi!!!
> 
> Eventually, you may put on the Wiki Page an example with more than one 
> PCI device, so that hectic persons like
> me see better that a) it's without parenthesis and b) a comma separated 
> list ;o).
> 
> BR,
> Carsten.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel