WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

AW: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 pvops k

To: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: AW: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 pvops kernels
From: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:00:47 +0200
Cc: jeremy@xxxxxxxx, konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:12:54 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

some short answers for now, it's late here...

  - I will provide the compile log later
  - System has 4GB, DomU will recieve 256MB
  - forcedeth works on all kernels under Xen 3.4.1, never on Xen 4.0
  - Mixing kernel versions will not help, it seems a problem between Xen 4.0 
and the driver
  - All 2.6.3x kernels are pvops
  - I will try Pasi's recomendation later this week

Thanks & Best Regards,
Carsten.


----- Originalnachricht -----
Von: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Don, 8.4.2010 22:46
An: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ; jeremy <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Re: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 pvops 
kernels

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:46:58PM +0200, Carsten Schiers wrote:
> OK, I am still a bit fuzzy as I had to learn how to git and configure 
> kernels, and I am still unsure whether I did everything 
> right. Nevertheless, and even when I cannot provide a lot of details, I 
> would like to inform you about some anomalies. 
> 
> Currently, I run Xen 3.4.1 and 2.6.18.8 kernels, 64 Bit Dom0 and some 32 
> Bit and 64 Bit DomUs on a Gigabyte M56S-S3 / AMD 4050e 
> with cpufreq on powernow-k8 in cpufreq=dom0-kernel mode. I make use of 
> PCI Passthrough for DVB-C cards and onboard NIC, as well 
> as for USB controller.
> 
> 
> 
> Compile problem on xen/stable-2.6.32
> ------------------------------------
> 
> I compiled 2.6.32.10-pvops for DomU only mode, resulting in compile 
> error very similar to 
> 
>   
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-03/msg00925.html
> 
> I get a "static declaration of 'xen_register_gsi' follows a non-static 
> declaration, because I have set CONFIG_XEN_PCI_MSI and 
> CONFIG_PCI_XEN, but not CONFIG_XEN_DOM0_PCI. It will disappear when 
> compiling a DOM0 kernel.
> 
Can you do a copy-n-paste of your compile problem, please?
> 
> 
> PCI controller / 2nd Function? / working in xen/master-2.6.32.13, not 
> working on xen/stable-2.6.32 on Xen 3.4.1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------
> 
> It will allow passthrough of all mentioned devices except one of the PCI 
> controllers. It will not be detected. Using 
> xm pci-attach will produce an error:
> 
>   troi kernel: [   23.862294] ehci_hcd 0000:00:01.1: device not 
> available because of BAR 0 [0xfc102000-0xfc1020ff] collisions
>   troi kernel: [   61.942809] ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.0: device not 
> available because of BAR 0 [0xfc104000-0xfc104fff] collisions

How much memory did you assign to the guest? If it is below 4GB, say 2GB
did you see these errors?

> nVidia forcedeth, working on pvops/Xen 3.4.1, not working on pvops/Xen 
> 4.0


> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> 
> The whole experiment was done because when I use Xen 4.0 with my 
> 2.6.18.8 kernels, I cannot use the onboard NIC any longer. The 
> driver forcedeth will report an error. So, as using the pvops DomU on 
> Xen 3.4.1 worked, I tried to also use a pvops Dom0 underneath

So.. DomU and Dom0 with the same kernel works?

> Xen 4.0, but the problem seems to be related to the Xen 4.0, which is 
> killing forcedeth MAC address detection. By the way: MSI has
> never worked for me on that NIC. So I had pci=nomsi on kernel.
> 
> not working example (MAC is random):
> 
>   troi kernel: [    4.335591] forcedeth: Reverse Engineered nForce 
> ethernet driver. Version 0.64.
>   troi kernel: [    4.335811] forcedeth 0000:00:00.0: enabling device 
> (0000 -> 0003)
>   troi kernel: [    4.335942] forcedeth 0000:00:00.0: Xen PCI enabling 
> IRQ: 23
>   troi kernel: [    4.336016] forcedeth 0000:00:00.0: setting latency 
> timer to 64
>   troi kernel: [    4.336271] forcedeth 0000:00:00.0: Invalid Mac 
> address detected: 00:00:00:00:00:00
>   troi kernel: [    4.336295] forcedeth 0000:00:00.0: Please complain to 
> your hardware vendor. Switching to a random MAC.
>   troi kernel: [    4.860537] forcedeth 0000:00:00.0: ifname eth0, PHY 
> OUI 0x732 @ 1, addr 5e:1a:09:69:77:5d
>   troi kernel: [    4.860593] forcedeth 0000:00:00.0: highdma pwrctl 
> mgmt gbit lnktim msi desc-v3
> 
> working example (real MAC, note different IRQ):
>  
>   troi kernel: [    1.133102] forcedeth: Reverse Engineered nForce 
> ethernet driver. Version 0.64.
>   troi kernel: [    1.133376] forcedeth 0000:00:01.0: enabling device 
> (0000 -> 0003)
>   troi kernel: [    1.133463] forcedeth 0000:00:01.0: Xen PCI enabling 
> IRQ: 19
>   troi kernel: [    1.652048] forcedeth 0000:00:01.0: ifname eth0, PHY 
> OUI 0x732 @ 1, addr 00:1d:7d:e8:97:7b
>   troi kernel: [    1.652139] forcedeth 0000:00:01.0: highdma pwrctl 
> mgmt gbit lnktim msi desc-v3

I got lost in your description. The failing case happens when
your Dom0 is 2.6.18 or the 2.6.31 (or 2.6.32?) And is the DomU pv-ops
or 2.6.18?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • AW: [Xen-devel] Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 pvops kernels, Carsten Schiers <=