xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice?

from [Ian Campbell]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice?
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:11:41 +0100
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:12:05 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<87oci3tgc6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization:	Citrix Systems, Inc.
References:	<20100331074950.GA18028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C7D8CA1D.F509%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100331085245.GA32106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100331091711.GA3434@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1270032395.10129.72604.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87oci3tgc6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:09 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 10:17 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Is it possible that this (which I presume is a flag set in the
> > filesystem metadata):
> >
> >> [    9.996577] EXT3-fs warning (device xvda1): ext3_clear_journal_err: 
> >> Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure
> >> [    9.996585] EXT3-fs warning (device xvda1): ext3_clear_journal_err: 
> >> Marking fs in need of filesystem check.
> >
> > would also have caused the filesystem to reject attempts to remount,rw
> > before the reboot until you rebooted and fsck ran?
> >
> > I took a look at your logs (other mail) and I can't see any mention of
> > an IO error on xvda either -- I must admit I'm pretty perplexed :-(
> 
> OTOH you shouldn't be surprised about not finding anything in the logs
> about the filesystem being read-only. :)

Doh, yes, right ;)

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice?, Ferenc Wagner Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice?, Ian Campbell <=

Previous by Date:	[Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice?, Ferenc Wagner
Next by Date:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 4] xl: vcpu commands and tsc_mode parameter, Eric Chanudet
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice?, Ferenc Wagner
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 4] xl: vcpu commands and tsc_mode parameter, Eric Chanudet
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]