WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] [retry 3] 3/3 Add support for AMD MPERF/APERF

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [retry 3] 3/3 Add support for AMD MPERF/APERF
From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:26:45 -0500
Cc:
Delivery-date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:28:01 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-rc6-tip; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
# HG changeset patch
# User mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx
# Date 1270061976 18000
# Node ID 9bde2053016569af994540ec11b9fa45d3d1a8d7
# Parent  c00eb5a678e61f4da0db7b4bdeab1660060376d2
Starting with Family 0x10, model 10 processors, some AMD processors
will have support for the APERF/MPERF MSRs.  This patch adds the
checks necessary to support those MSRs.

It also makes the get_measured_perf function defined inside cpufreq.c
driver independent.  The max_freq is passed to the function by the caller
instead of being taking from the acpi-cpufreq only drv_data structure.

Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>

diff -r c00eb5a678e6 -r 9bde20530165 xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c       Wed Mar 31 13:58:45 2010 -0500
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c       Wed Mar 31 13:59:36 2010 -0500
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@
  * Only IA32_APERF/IA32_MPERF ratio is architecturally defined and
  * no meaning should be associated with absolute values of these MSRs.
  */
-static unsigned int get_measured_perf(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int flag)
+unsigned int get_measured_perf(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int flag)
 {
     struct cpufreq_policy *policy;    
     struct perf_pair readin, cur, *saved;
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@
 
 #endif
 
-    retval = drv_data[policy->cpu]->max_freq * perf_percent / 100;
+    retval = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * perf_percent / 100;
 
     return retval;
 }
diff -r c00eb5a678e6 -r 9bde20530165 xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c      Wed Mar 31 13:58:45 2010 -0500
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c      Wed Mar 31 13:59:36 2010 -0500
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include <acpi/acpi.h>
 #include <acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.h>
 
+#define CPUID_6_ECX_APERFMPERF_CAPABILITY       (0x1)
 #define CPUID_FREQ_VOLT_CAPABILITIES    0x80000007
 #define CPB_CAPABLE             0x00000200
 #define USE_HW_PSTATE           0x00000080
@@ -61,6 +62,8 @@
 
 static struct powernow_cpufreq_data *drv_data[NR_CPUS];
 
+static struct cpufreq_driver powernow_cpufreq_driver;
+
 struct drv_cmd {
     unsigned int type;
     cpumask_t mask;
@@ -249,6 +252,10 @@
 
     if (c->cpuid_level >= 6) {
         unsigned int edx;
+        unsigned int ecx;
+        ecx = cpuid_ecx(6);
+        if (ecx & CPUID_6_ECX_APERFMPERF_CAPABILITY)
+            powernow_cpufreq_driver.getavg = get_measured_perf;
         edx = cpuid_edx(CPUID_FREQ_VOLT_CAPABILITIES);
         if ((edx & CPB_CAPABLE) == CPB_CAPABLE) {
             policy->turbo = CPUFREQ_TURBO_ENABLED;


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>