Re: [Xen-devel] [BUGFIX] [PATCH] freeze_bdev in 2.6.32 pv-ops

To:	benco <benco@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [BUGFIX] [PATCH] freeze_bdev in 2.6.32 pv-ops
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:39:05 -0700
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:39:24 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20100327233635.GD29834@xxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<20100327230621.GC29834@xxxxxxx> <4BAE8619.6000504@xxxxxxxx> <20100327233635.GD29834@xxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3

On 03/27/2010 04:36 PM, benco wrote:

It should already be present in xen/stable-2.6.32.x as of 2.6.32.9.

My appologies, I should be more precise. I'm using xen/next.

xen/next just has purely Xen changes against 2.6.32. I'd recommendusing a stable branch for actual running to pick up any other kernelbugfixes.


    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES