WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen

To: Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:38:23 -0700
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:39:49 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201003180930.30655.sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003101457100.28412@kaball-desktop> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003171047230.23661@kaball-desktop> <4BA0FF8C.30302@xxxxxxxx> <201003180930.30655.sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3
On 03/17/2010 06:30 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
Xiantao has some interesting ideas for this.

Xiantao and I have discussed on this for a month... Basically we have got two
approaches now, but we can't reach an agreement... I would work on it after
current hybrid thing settled down. Of course, we want MSI support benefit
pv_ops dom0 as well as hybrid.

Xiantao's proposal of a new top-level MSI API for the kernel looks pretty clean, and I think it has a reasonable chance of being accepted upstream.

What's your proposal?

Thanks,
    J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>