|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 14:23 +0000, Ritu kaur wrote:
> Thanks Ian, could you please clarify me how are interrupts handled for
> pci passthrough device. I thought it is delivered via evtchn from
> pciback to pcifront i.e
> InterruptDescTable->Hypervisor->pciback->pcifront->actual_device is
> this correct?
Yes, but not on the event channel you found previously, there is a
separate one for each device IRQ.
> IRQ is 11 in dom0 for nic device but after driver for nic is loaded in
> domU IRQ is changed to 17.
That's expected, there isn't really any relationship between the IRQ
assignment in the guest and domain 0.
> When you say try with another device should I try with another nic
> device or someother device?
Any device which doesn't share an IRQ with another, it doesn't really
matter what sort of device it is. NICs are often a convenient choice
since they are relatively easy to confirm they are working.
Ian.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Ian Campbell
> <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 13:43 +0000, Ritu kaur wrote:
> > Hi Ian.
> >
> > pcifront_handler_aer is the callback function.
>
>
> This is not the same interrupt/evtchn as your device's
> interrupt though.
> This is the PCI error handling notification interrupt (PCI AER
> is PCI
> Advanced Error Reporting).
>
> [...]
>
> > Yes my nic device is sharing interrupts(IRQ17) with usb and
> ide
> > devices in dom0.
>
>
> This may be your problem, I don't know if this is expected to
> work or
> not.
>
> You could experiment with another device which doesn't share
> an
> interrupt, just to check that the basic mechanism is working.
>
> Ian.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1,
Ian Campbell <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Ritu kaur
- Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Pasi Kärkkäinen
|
|
|
|
|