|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
On 03/16/2010 10:32 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Actually I think Ian is right, we can do it without a new hypercall: if
we assume tsc_mode=2 then this simple patch makes the pv clocksource work
fine without any set_tsc_offset(v, 0) in xen:
Can we detect if this patch is present in Xen or not? If not, we may
need to go back to having a feature flag.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Sheng Yang
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Sheng Yang
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Sheng Yang
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Sheng Yang
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
|
|
|
|
|