WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][v9 4/6] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initial

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][v9 4/6] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initialization
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:29:23 -0700
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yaozu \(Eddie\) Dong" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:33:59 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1268760010.10129.31253.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1268362647-5317-1-git-send-email-sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003151108151.27222@kaball-desktop> <4B9EBBEE.9020107@xxxxxxxx> <201003160951.48973.sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9FBBEA.2060508@xxxxxxxx> <1268760010.10129.31253.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3
On 03/16/2010 10:20 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
I don't think a new hypercall is required. Xen should simply pre-account
for the TSC offset which HVM guests are subject to in
__update_vcpu_system_time.

Yes, that would work too.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel