Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen

To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
From:	Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	Stefano@xxxxxxxxx, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:04:51 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1268668929; bh=3rRhDv1wXBaevsfuuGViO28Y+sZH2uKjIuEtlISF2xw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OPzD4nl+gdsME0FpjrYFrWlakmnD8xbSxXa/frxI7NYHO+egQqqWBNOJdEqa4lEbV1Kb1mj7/+hR7YynXk4hsxKUzzVrhZofwXmAn5AUBt35aIF264I1GCoqJx7tPNTZkpoSDMJWaNUvfJ7KqUjBAllafM4QAxx7psKE9eNOVH8=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4UgjruUiSHQTUSLsY7wVQXJP9x7vur74mPqVuJbZOyMHT3SUnNVpiznsYInkNJ4WTyoTJrZoXdUELa3M6vXsw0UWVkkpAsESL9m9COxl2/2Ud4DT2FR7R6A87KSqeBZu6KyZRg+FiQnt/uvN+MPAICKRJB+INGODZDw9LDrid+8=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1003151550510.25829@kaball-desktop>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Boris, could you please checkout the new branch pvhvm-stefano and see if
> it works for you as an HVM DomU?
> The xen side patch is still required.

Yes

Boris

--- On Mon, 3/15/10, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stabellini" <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano@xxxxxxxxx, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 11:53 AM

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/12/2010 02:13 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > Yes. That's what i see on my box.
> >
>
> OK, over to you Stefano. Why is Boris seeing an instacrash in dom0 with
> your patches in place?
>

I think it might be a problem of the old "enhanced" patch series; surely
this bug cannot affect the new series because the same kernel cannot be
used for dom0 and domU anymore (the new series is applied to a clean
2.6.32 kernel).

Boris, could you please checkout the new branch pvhvm-stefano and see if
it works for you as an HVM DomU?
The xen side patch is still required.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen