|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]x86: Fix possible S3 suspend hangs
Oh, don't worry about it. It's more obvious than I first thought!
-- Keir
On 12/03/2010 07:20, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not doubting this race exists, but could you briefly give an example of an
> offlining scenario that would hit the hang? And explain the result: is it
> that the offliner thinks the operation doesn't complete and spins forever in
> __cpu_die()?
>
> -- Keir
>
> On 12/03/2010 03:42, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> X86: Fix possible S3 suspend hangs
>>
>> It is possible for cpu to become offlined before irq disabled in idle loop,
>> which will cause this cpu stay in C state and can't wakeup to play dead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Ke <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> diff -r 132ac04cbdba xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c Tue Mar 09 18:18:19 2010 +0000
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c Fri Mar 12 11:07:43 2010 +0800
>> @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ static void acpi_processor_idle(void)
>> */
>> local_irq_disable();
>>
>> - if ( softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) )
>> + if ( softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) ||
>> + cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()) )
>> {
>> local_irq_enable();
>> sched_tick_resume();
>> diff -r 132ac04cbdba xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c Tue Mar 09 18:18:19 2010 +0000
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c Fri Mar 12 11:12:24 2010 +0800
>> @@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ static void default_idle(void)
>> static void default_idle(void)
>> {
>> local_irq_disable();
>> - if ( !softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) )
>> + if ( !softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) &&
>> + cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) )
>> safe_halt();
>> else
>> local_irq_enable();
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|