|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
To: |
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking |
From: |
Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:30:05 +0800 |
Cc: |
"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Noboru Iwamatsu <n_iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:30:52 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<1268283150.3015.69.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<C77E162B.6FE6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B59098B.6000108@xxxxxxxxx> <4B590FA4.4000008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B59132B.40607@xxxxxxxxx> <4B59188C.50901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B59660F.4000909@xxxxxxxxx> <7162ab21003091339i4adb8669safd5e074607386a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9706B3.3050903@xxxxxxxxx> <1268191101.3015.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> <4B9711CF.7030908@xxxxxxxxx> <1268192253.3015.37.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> <4B971F57.9000903@xxxxxxxxx> <1268196438.3015.56.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> <4B974438.3050806@xxxxxxxxx> <1268229408.14039.151.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> <1268244414.14039.206.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> <4B985150.1000001@xxxxxxxxx> <1268274721.3015.64.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> <4B986736.9000204@xxxxxxxxx> <1268283150.3015.69.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:44 +0800, Weidong Han wrote:
good suggestion to check the device type. I cooked a new patch. It skips
checking IOAPIC and HPET. pls have a try.
I like this approach better, but the patch doesn't work as is. The
problem is acpi_scope is getting incremented as a structure instead of
by length bytes. It either needs to be cast on the increment, or maybe
cast on use like this:
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
diff -r 132ac04cbdba xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c Tue Mar 09 18:18:19 2010 +0000
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c Wed Mar 10 21:46:49 2010 -0700
@@ -407,9 +407,15 @@
{
u8 b, d, f;
int i, invalid_cnt = 0;
+ void *p;
- for ( i = 0; i < dmaru->scope.devices_cnt; i++ )
+ for ( i = 0, p = dev_scope_start; i < dmaru->scope.devices_cnt;
+ i++, p += ((struct acpi_dev_scope *)p)->length )
{
+ if ( ((struct acpi_dev_scope *)p)->dev_type == ACPI_DEV_IOAPIC ||
+ ((struct acpi_dev_scope *)p)->dev_type == ACPI_DEV_MSI_HPET )
+ continue;
+
b = PCI_BUS(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
d = PCI_SLOT(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
f = PCI_FUNC(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
Acked-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Weidong
diff -r cadf1bae9ee2 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c Thu Feb 25 18:26:45 2010 +0800
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c Thu Mar 11 19:39:45 2010 +0800
@@ -407,9 +407,15 @@ acpi_parse_one_drhd(struct acpi_dmar_ent
{
u8 b, d, f;
int i, invalid_cnt = 0;
+ struct acpi_dev_scope *acpi_scope = dev_scope_start;
for ( i = 0; i < dmaru->scope.devices_cnt; i++ )
{
+ acpi_scope += (i == 0) ? 0 : acpi_scope->length;
+ if ( acpi_scope->dev_type == ACPI_DEV_IOAPIC ||
+ acpi_scope->dev_type == ACPI_DEV_MSI_HPET )
+ continue;
+
b = PCI_BUS(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
d = PCI_SLOT(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
f = PCI_FUNC(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking,
Weidong Han <=
|
|
|
|
|