On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:16:13PM +0530, Arvind R wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 02:47:58PM +0530, Arvind R wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> >> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah... Can you also instrument the code to print the PFN? The code goes
> through insert_pfn->pfn_pte, which calls xen_make_pte, which ends up
> doing pte_pfn_to_mfn. That routine does a pfn_to_mfn which does a
> get_phys_to_machine(pfn). The last routine looks up the PFN->MFN lookup
> table and finds a MFN that corresponds to this PFN. Since the memory
> was allocated from ... well this is the big question.
>
> Is the memory allocated from normal kernel space or is really backed by
> the video card. In your previous e-mails you mentioned that is_iomem is
> set to zero, which implies that the memory for these functions is NOT
> memory backed.
>
> the VM_IO is OK if the memory that is being referenced is the video
> driver memory. _BUT_ if the memory is being allocated through the
> alloc_page (ttm_tt_alloc_page) , or kmalloc, then this will cause us
> headaches. You might want to check in ttm_bo_vm_fault what the
> vma->vm_flags are and if VM_IO is set.
>
> (FYI, look at
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git;a=commit;h=e84db8b7136d1b4a393dbd982201d0c5a3794333)
How do you remember these refs?!
>
> Thought I am not sure if the ttm_bo_mmap is used by the nvidia driver.
U mean nouveau? Only for accelerated graphics.
> Attached is a re-write of the debug patch I sent earlier. I compile
> tested it but haven't yet run it (just doing that now).
>
Output: (snipped/cut/pasted for easier association)
Trace of Pushbuf Memory Access, Bare-BOOT:
X: OUT_RING: Enter: chan=0x8170a0, id=2, data=0x48000, chan->cur=0x7f0aa3594054
kernel: [TTM] FAULTing-in address=0x7f0aa3594000, bo->buffer_start=0x0
kernel: [ BEFORE]PFN: 0x7513f PTE: 0x750001e3 (val:750001e3): [ RW
PSE GLB x ] [2M]
kernel: [ AFTER]PFN: 0x7513f PTE: 0x750001e3 (val:750001e3): [
RW PSE GLB x ] [2M]
kernel: [BEFORE]PFN: 0x75144 PTE: 0x750001e3 (val:750001e3): [ RW
PSE GLB x ][2M]
kernel: [ AFTER]PFN: 0x75144 PTE: 0x750001e3 (val:750001e3): [ RW
PSE GLB x ] [2M]
< --- and so on for 14 more pages --->
X: OUT_RING: updated data
X: OUT_RING: Exit
Trace of Pushbuf Memory Access, Xen-BOOT:
X: OUT_RING: Enter: chan=0x8170a0, id=2, data=0x44000, chan->cur=0x7f98838df000
kernel: [TTM] FAULTing-in address=0x7f98838df000, bo->buffer_start=0x0
kernel: [BEFORE]PFN: 0x16042 PTE: 0x10000068042067
(val:10000068042067): [mfn:426050->ffff880016042000USR RW
x ] [4K]
kernel: [ AFTER]PFN: 0x16042 PTE: 0x10000068042067
(val:10000068042067): [mfn:426050->ffff880016042000USR RW
x ] [4K]
kernel: [BEFORE]PFN: 0x16043 PTE: 0x10000068043067
(val:10000068043067): [mfn:426051->ffff880016043000USR RW
x ] [4K]
kernel: [ AFTER]PFN: 0x16043 PTE: 0x10000068043067
(val:10000068043067): [mfn:426051->ffff880016043000USR RW
x ] [4K]
< --- and so on for 14 more pages --->
< --- and repeat fault --->
kernel: [TTM] FAULTing-in address=0x7f98838df000, bo->buffer_start=0x0
Do you know what is happening? Is a solution feasible?
Sequence of nouveau operation as I understand it:
1. prepare for user pushbuf write by grabbing memory access rights
(exclude GPU access)
2. Do the write
3. finish and release grab
The memory may/maynot be on the video card. There is a vram_pushbuf
module option which would probably complicate things more. GPU is
informed about the address, I suppose,
in the prepare and finish pre/postamble to RING access.
and, THANKS hugely for your help.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home