|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Intel: Overly restrictive test for availablility of CPUID ma
Hi,
http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/aab9fbd6ffa0 from
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-07/msg00518.html
restricts the CPUID masking feature to model 0x1d or model 0x17 with
stepping >=4:
if (!((model == 0x1d) || ((model == 0x17) && ((eax & 0xf) >=
4)))) {
/* fail ... */
A Xeon E5520 which is supposed to have FlexMigration has family 6, model
26 (0x1a) and stepping 5 fails the existing test and we think it should
be allowed.
Is there a more precise way of detecting the presence of this
capability? I've seen:
family > 0x6 || (model > 0x17 || (model = 0x17 && stepping >= 4))
suggested but this looks like it matches exactly the same set of
processors as the "eax < 0x00010674" in the code before aab9fbd6ffa0
which was apparently too lenient?
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Intel: Overly restrictive test for availablility of CPUID masking MSRs?,
Ian Campbell <=
|
|
|
|
|