WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
From: Fantu <fantonifabio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Delivery-date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:29:15 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100226084213.GJ2761@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <27714378.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B878697.8050904@xxxxxxxxxx> <20100226084213.GJ2761@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Now with config example in wiki page do very big modules and initrd, is
possible do same config without only not necessary for do more small?

Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:30:15AM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>>    Il 25/02/2010 20:05, Jeremy Fitzhardinge ha scritto:
>> 
>>      On 02/25/2010 12:59 AM, Fantu wrote:
>> 
>>        I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is
>> good?
>>        for test
>>        it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in
>>        buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right?
>>        I also see update in this page, for use config example for
>> xen/stable
>>        i must
>>        use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"?
>>        Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn't in
>>        example
>>        config?
>> 
>> 
>>      xen/stable is still a work in progress, but it should be suitable
>> for
>>      general use.  It is based on xen/next (which is 2.6.32 based), but
>> it
>>      also has the 2.6.32.x stable kernels merged into it.
>> 
>>      At the moment it is missing a few features compared to xen/master;
>> in
>>      particular it is missing PCI passthrough and ACPI power management.
>> 
>>      This will become a long-term supported Xen kernel (as 2.6.32 is
>> going to
>>      be a long-term supported Linux release).  There will also be a
>>      development tree which tracks ongoing Linux development.
>> 
>>          J
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo.
>>  Controllato da AVG - [1]www.avg.com
>>  Versione: 9.0.733 / Database dei virus: 271.1.1/2709 -  Data di
>> rilascio: 02/25/10 08:34:00
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    I have try to change xen/master in xen/stable or xen/next but give
>> error:
>>    error: pathspec 'xen/stable' did not match any file(s) known to git.
>>    error: pathspec 'xen/next' did not match any file(s) known to git.
>> 
> 
> git pull
> git reset --hard
> git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable
> git pull
> 
> and verify the changelog with "git log" and compare to output from:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/stable
> 
> -- Pasi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Question-about-xen-stable-branch-in-kernel-pv_ops-tp27714378p27740714.html
Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel