On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Daniel Stodden
<daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 17:41 -0500, Keith Coleman wrote:
>
>> This graph shows the performance under a webserver disk IO workload at
>> different queue depths. It compares the 4 main IO methods for windows
>> guests that will be available in the upcoming xen 4.0.0 and 3.4.3
>> releases: pure HVM, stub domains, gplpv drivers, and xcp winpv
>> drivers.
>
> Cool, thanks. If I may ask, what exactly did you run?
iometer
>> The gplpv and xcp winpv drivers have comparable performance with gplpv
>> being slightly faster. Both pv drivers are considerably faster than
>> pure hvm or stub domains. Stub domain performance was about even with
>> HVM which is lower than we were expecting. We tried a different cpu
>> pinning in "Stubdom B" with little impact.
>
> Is this an SMP dom0? A single guest?
Dual core server with dom0 pinned to core 0 and a single domU pinned
to core 1. Stubdom was pinned to core 0 then core 1.
Keith Coleman
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home