WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] modifying drivers

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] modifying drivers
From: Ritu kaur <ritu.kaur.us@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:03:49 -0800
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:05:24 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zwQf/pDqKDSCKhlpQiIjD3L0YGfHuRE7W1HorAsvUqw=; b=pBRu4/BO/FZ+RDLC5TKgnDbcgemntWz4shAiz/54JoXZ3FfgACOrIkWRIRGQHSJV+Y gnfEBR7DIgYxN8OZKp9fm8ule88aH0f23/Po2Gcte1RTw5mfsruYmlz6khTOUIOGaluS WPDtMMdoRNthvWiCddqDFyGZwawJ80/X0uusU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=SZQLTheZAvSLcimrRHeoeK8Ht7HJRWfpGA0rGuMGPgx/GQmsdRkqdpIINvBEQ4Jzjr EU6NyHi3Yj+Rfy9AMQ+Hz6GypUxKI/Kb3QYt5XvYE02YYGcak12Td3b3aAtmlwg9OP1g pFJr/NNDvKCl2XMdGoCgmKmuuekdICSPMW+3g=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1266511171.10261.2027.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <29b32d341002180827v7cd5f219u767f97554fdf4c58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1266511171.10261.2027.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:27 +0000, Ritu kaur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am modifying netback driver code such that it allows access to only
> one domU(based on lowest domid) when multiple domUs are present. When
> the domU with the lowest domid is suspended then the next domU in the
> list will get access.

Why?

>  I believe it can be done via xe/xm commands or via Citrix Xencenter
> by selecting or deselecting during vm installation or by adding and
> deleting nics, however, I wanted to control this from netback driver.

The toolstack is exactly the correct place to make and implement this
sort of policy decision -- it has no place in the kernel netback driver.

Hi Ian,

Consider a case when I have multiple domU's and both have NIC's installed. From one domU, i would like to run nightly scripts which involve

1. download fpga code
2. bringup the driver
3. start the test scripts in a domU which checks for packets transmitted/received. During this time, I would like exclusive access to my domU only.

One way to do it is via xe/xm cli or xencenter deleting the NIC from the other domU or letting the user of the other domU know that tests are running and not access the NIC (if there is any other way to do it let me know), which to me is a overhead and we want to avoid it by modifying netback drivers. By the way, plan is to have seperate netback/netfront for our NIC such that it doesn't meddle with existing drivers. Hence would like some inputs w.r.t debugging the netback tx/rx code.

Thanks


Ian.

>  For this,
>
> 1.  keep track of devices created via netback_probe function which is
> called for every device.
> 2. Use domid field in netif_st data structure
> 3. Added new function netif_check_domid and placed it along with
> netif_schedulable, I add a check if netif->domid is the lowest one(via
> list created in step 1)
> 4. Function netif_schedulable is called from
> a. tx_queue_callback
> b. netif_be_start_xmit
> c. net_rx_action
> d. add_to_net_schedule_tail
> e. netif_be_int
>
> This works fine for the first vm that comes up. However, subsequent vm
> bringup has issues which reboots dom0 itself.
>
> 5. I removed the function added by me in function netif_be_start_xmit
> only, this allows multiple vm's to be up and will allow only first vm
> to access netback. However, this has issues with the second
> functionality I would like to have i.e when first vm is suspended,
> next vm in the list should get access. I added kernel printfs in above
> functions and none of them are called after first vm is suspended and
> subsequent vm is trying to access.
>
> Wanted to know inputs from experts on this and how to proceed with
> debugging.
>
> Thanks
>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel