|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assign
mail ignored wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:58 AM, mail ignored <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
thanks. i suppose i'll file a bug @ opensuse abt this, and see if
they'll put something into code so these changes will 'survive'
xen(-tools) updates ...
cref -> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573311
I think this is not a bug. pls note that the devices behind
PCIe-to-PCI/PCI-x bridge or Conventional PCI bridge can only be
collectively assigned to a single domain, because the source-id in DMA
requests is not device's bdf. Pls refer to section 3.6.1 in VT-d spec.
What's more, FLR is required to make sure the device in a correct status
before assignment, and some devices need to reset secondary bus to reset
the device which results in all the devices behind same
PCIe-to-PCI/PCI-x bridge or Conventional PCI bridge be reset. In your
case, you need to hide all NICs (04:06.0 and 04:07.0) behind the same
bridge, and assign them together to a guest. or you can set
"pci-passthrough-strict-check no" in /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp and
restart xend to loose the check in xend, but in this way you should be
aware of potential issues (e.g. assigned device doesn't work).
Regards,
Weidong
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", mail ignored
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", mail ignored
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", mail ignored
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", mail ignored
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", mail ignored
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", mail ignored
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem",
Weidong Han <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", 0bo0
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", 0bo0
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: follow up to a pciback "pv pci-passthrough co-assigned problem", Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|