|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
Hi,
I re-send the DRHD-fix patch.
If DRHD does not have existent devices, ignore it.
If DRHD has both existent and non-existent devices, consider it invalid
and not register.
What happens if you register a DRHD with some but not all devices existing?
Do bad things happen on some systems?
In the case I have posted the log, DRHD has only non-existent devices,
and maybe its info is invalid. So iommu_enable_translation() failed and
became panic.
When DRHD has at least one existent device, I have not seen,
its info might be correct. I cannot judge it, so disabled at the patch.
Even if this DRHD-ignore patch is not accepted, we should validate the
DRHD and stop the PANIC.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Han, Weidong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Andrew Lyon
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking,
Noboru Iwamatsu <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Noboru Iwamatsu
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Noboru Iwamatsu
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Andrew Lyon
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|