|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
On 21/01/2010 10:19, "Weidong Han" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sorry this is typo.
>> I mean:
>> So, I think RMRR that has no-existent device is "invalid"
>> and whole RMRR should be ignored.
>>
> looks reasonable.
>
> Keir, I Acks Noboru's rmrr patch. Or do you want us to merge them to one
> patch?
Merge them up, re-send with both sign-off and acked-by all in one email.
Thanks,
Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Han, Weidong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Noboru Iwamatsu
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Han, Weidong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Noboru Iwamatsu
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Noboru Iwamatsu
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Noboru Iwamatsu
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Sander Eikelenboom
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Noboru Iwamatsu
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Noboru Iwamatsu
|
|
|
|
|