|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Tagging Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate, 44-bit addres
On 19/01/2010 13:57, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Perhaps due to the lack of x86 processors supporting more than 40-bits
>>> of physical address space that are currently on the market. But we
>>> know that's going to change fairly shortly and x86 will finally get
>>> support for more than 1TB. That opens the doors for hardware vendors
>>> to create interesting configurations and maybe not worry so much about
>>> compressing the address space into a contiguous block. If Xen can't
>>> support at least a 44-bit physical address space within the 4.x
>>> lifetime, it could become a serious limiting factor. It seems rather
>>> shortsighted not to prepare for it now, especially given the
>>> opportunity we have at a major version break. Thanks,
>>
>> If it's considered important we can hold up until next week.
>
> Any progress with this 44-bit address space support?
Yes, it's checked in now, ahead of 4.0.0-rc2.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|