On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tbh I don't think we've ever done a detailed
> analysis of ntp performance on Xen before -- this is something we might be
> able to improve.
just fyi -- this may be all old info for you -- this
"Kernel Model for Precision Timekeeping"
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/kern.html
and the site/info around it, seem to be the authoritative resource on
timekeeping with ntp (function, debugging, etc).
it's been a great resource in understanding the expected behavior of ntp.
i also found good general guidance in
"Network Time Protocol (NTP) Overview and Configuration: An Internet2 Cookbook"
http://e2epi.internet2.edu/npw/binder-docs/ntp-cookbook.pdf
although it does include a # of quotes/references to Mills' bias
against Linux, e.g.,
“I have confronted Linux many, many times with broken this and that
and concluded I will not attempt to examine, fix, or judge anything
Linux. You are on your own.” —David L. Mills, 2004-10-20
so it's not clear, at least to me, if there are in fact 'deeper'
issues with ntp at hand. hopefully that's gotten better over the
years ...
hth.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|