WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel][Pv-ops][PATCH] Netback multiple tasklet support

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel][Pv-ops][PATCH] Netback multiple tasklet support
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:55:37 +0000
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xu <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Smith <Steven.Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dongxiao
Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:57:15 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B4DABBE0200007800029A6F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D006B913@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA342A7A7E951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D006BBAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA342A7A7E95E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D11C1BE3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B182D87.6030901@xxxxxxxx> <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D11C20F8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B187513.80003@xxxxxxxx> <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D13FDE62@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B200727.8040000@xxxxxxxx> <1260436078.23698.45463.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B4DABBE0200007800029A6F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:17 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> 10.12.09 10:07 >>>
> >Subject: xen: ensure locking gnttab_copy_grant_page is safe against 
> >interrupts.
> >
> >Now that netback processing occurs in a thread instead of a tasklet
> >gnttab_copy_grant_page needs to be safe against interrupts.
> >
> >The code is currently commented out in this tree but on 2.6.18 we observed a
> >deadlock where the netback thread called gnttab_copy_grant_page, locked
> >gnttab_dma_lock for writing, was interrupted and on return from interrupt the
> >network stack's TX tasklet ended up calling __gnttab_dma_map_page via the
> >hardware driver->swiotlb and tries to take gnttab_dma_lock for reading.
> >
> >Correct the commented code so we don't get bitten if/when it is re-enabled.
> 
> Wouldn't safe-against-softirq be sufficient then?

Yes, I guess so.

> Or if not (i.e. if meant to be generic), wouldn't the irq-safe variant need 
> to be used
> independent of the new feature (and then also in the 2.6.18 tree)?

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>